Skip to main content
← Reno

Reno City Council

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

What Happened

Reno City Council held a 5+ hour meeting with 26 votes on routine items, graffiti funding, state legislation positions, and a contentious 104-acre University of Nevada, Reno land rezoning that drew 24 speakers and split the council 4-2.

Key Decisions

APPROVED — UNR Main Station Farm rezoning from General Rural to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for office, commercial, and business park uses on 104 acres near McCarran Boulevard — 4-2 vote — Allows university to develop research and business space; opponents argued it converts prime farmland, violates flood zone protections, and abandons the land-grant agricultural mission.

APPROVED — Graffiti abatement program using asset forfeiture funds to hire one full-time abatement worker and expand 7-day weekly coverage — Unanimous vote — Addresses downtown graffiti crisis on Virginia Street and other corridors; funded through federally regulated asset forfeiture with 11-month authorization available.

APPROVED — City Attorney authority to handle certain labor disputes in-house rather than hiring outside counsel at $415/hour — Unanimous vote — Saves money on legal expenses for routine labor matters.

REJECTED — Proposal to change Reno City Council from non-partisan to partisan elections — 5-1 vote — Council will remain non-partisan; maintains focus on local issues over party affiliation.

REJECTED — Senate Bill 457 creating a sixth ward and ward-only voting system — Unanimous vote — Voters rejected similar measure in November 2012 with 73% support for current at-large system.

APPROVED — Assembly Bill 342 supporting new hybrid PERS retirement system for employees hired after July 1, 2014 — 5-1 vote — Addresses unfunded pension liability concerns; one councilmember opposed due to concerns about private investment involvement.

CONTINUED — Virginia Street/Center Street traffic direction — Council will hold neighborhood meeting with merchants before deciding whether to reverse one-way configuration on Center Street.

Debated But Not Resolved

Flood mitigation standards — Council questioned whether one-to-one flood displacement ratio is adequate for property in critical flood zone; university committed to "doing better" during design phase but no specific requirement set.

Agricultural land preservation — Opponents argued 104 acres should remain in farming and food production; university argued agricultural programs can expand on remaining 8,812 acres and defended zoning as asset protection without immediate development commitment.

Open space zoning alternative — Councilmember questioned why open space zoning wasn't considered instead of PUD; staff indicated current UT4 zoning was sufficient under code despite flood zone location.

Securitas security contract stability — Councilmember criticized ninth contract amendment indicating staffing problems and frequent changes at Community Assistance Center; staff committed to RFP process by July 1 to establish long-term stability.

Police staffing levels — Public commenter cited only 14 officers per 10,000 residents (among lowest nationally) and questioned why Safety 88 property tax revenue ($10 million, 2012) is diverted to general fund rather than police budget; no council response recorded.

What to Watch

$11,000 — Wells Avenue merchants graffiti removal and promotional materials — Donation funds

$5,000 — Reno Continental Little League park improvements — Donation funds

$1,000 — Washoe County Livestock Show operations — Donation funds

UNR flood mitigation ratio — University must specify exact one-to-one-plus ratio during design phase; regional planning commission review expected April-May 2013.

Graffiti program budget cycle decision — Asset forfeiture funds cover only 11 months; council must decide full funding source during budget process.

Virginia Street/Center Street traffic study — Neighborhood meeting outcome will determine whether one-way configuration reverses to improve business access.

Get Reno government news every week

Every vote. Every debate. Zero jargon.