Skip to main content
← Reno

Planning Commission Meeting

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

What Happened

The Reno Planning Commission met and voted on seven major development projects and policy changes affecting residential, commercial, and downtown areas — plus elected new leadership — over about 2.5 hours.

Key Decisions

[APPROVED] — The Canyons Planned Unit Development handbook amendment (allows 45 additional residential units on a 161-acre site east of Mine Shaft Drive in Ward 2) — 5-1 vote — Applicant must now submit a constraints map showing archaeological, wildlife, and regional trail constraints before final site plan approval. More housing in Ward 2, but with added design review requirements.

[APPROVED] — Lo-Bar Social conditional use permit to operate live music entertainment until 2 a.m. daily — 6-0 vote initially; 5-1 on removal of Condition 10 — Downtown bar can now book live bands any night of the week without administrator authority to revoke permit for noise violations. Expansion of nightlife in downtown Riverwalk District.

[APPROVED] — Calvary Chapel zoning change from Industrial Commercial to Mixed Employment (2.16 acres on Edison Way, Ward 3) — 6-0 vote — Site rezoned to match Master Plan designation. Allows mixed employment uses.

[APPROVED] — Furukawa Rock Drill conditional use permit for heavy machinery rental, sales, and service (1 acre in Ward 4 Mixed-Use Suburban zone) — 6-0 vote — Heavy equipment business approved with required outdoor storage screening.

[APPROVED] — Talus Valley Planning Area 23 tentative map extension (60.54-acre residential project in Ward 3) — 6-0 vote — Deadline to record final map extended by two years to November 4, 2026. No changes to existing development conditions.

[CONTINUED] — Manzanita Fence major deviation (request to increase front yard fence height from 4 feet to 6 feet) — Postponed at applicant request — Decision deferred to future meeting.

[ELECTED] — Harris Armstrong as Planning Commission Chair and Kerry Rohrmeier as Vice Chair — 6-0 votes each — New leadership takes over.

Debated But Not Resolved

The Canyons project fire response times — Commissioner Villanueva raised concern that fire response times already exceed six minutes citywide and that adding 45 houses worsens public safety. Staff said the master plan allows this in limited cases if fire sprinklers are required and emergency access is adequate. No resolution; concern documented but project moved forward.

Live music hours: daily until 2 a.m. versus restricted weekends only — Villanueva advocated for limiting 2 a.m. entertainment to Thursday-Saturday only, citing lack of citywide noise standards and neighborhood impact. Commissioners Velto and Rohrmeier said daily allowance helps business success and the 24-hour downtown should support it. Villanueva lost the vote 5-1.

Lack of decibel noise standards in downtown — Commissioner Becerra raised that without specific noise limits in the city code, enforcement is subjective. Staff confirmed no decibel threshold exists and said establishing standards is a work-in-progress. Will not retroactively apply to existing permits.

Whether The Canyons PUD circumvents development code — Villanueva argued the project only got amended because the original economics didn't work under the existing handbook, and that approving now prevents denial later at the tentative map stage. Other commissioners said concerns were premature and that tentative maps can still be denied. Villanueva voted no; motion passed 5-1.

What to Watch

None over $50,000.

The Canyons constraints map submission — Applicant must provide a detailed map showing archaeological resources, wildlife habitat, and regional trail constraints before the tentative map comes back. This is the next checkpoint where commissioners can still impose design conditions.

Downtown noise standards — City staff is developing a citywide decibel limit ordinance. Once adopted, it could affect how noise complaints at Lo-Bar and similar venues are enforced. Watch whether it applies retroactively.

Manzanita Fence decision — The deferred fence height request will return for a vote. Low impact, but establishes precedent on fence setbacks.

Get Reno government news every week

Every vote. Every debate. Zero jargon.